Brown v. Andrews

1 Barb. 227
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 11, 1847
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 1 Barb. 227 (Brown v. Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Andrews, 1 Barb. 227 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1847).

Opinion

Edmonds, J.

That is no objection. Attachments against parties to the suit, and the papers therein, ought to be so entitled.

The defendant then objected that his co-defendant Wiswall had died before the defendant was arrested; and that the suit had not been revived.

The death of a defendant is an abatement as to himself alone; and pending aii abatement by his death, even process of contempt may be executed against the other defendant.

The defendant then demurred to several of the interrogatories because they related to other alleged contempts in the cause than that for' which he had been arrested.

. The demurrers must be allowed. The inter-' rogatories should be confined to the fact of the service of the order or process and to the acts of neglect or commission constituting the violation thereof. They should not' relate to any previous proceeding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hendryx v. Fitzpatrick
19 F. 810 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1884)
Rossner v. New York Museum Ass'n
27 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 182 (New York Supreme Court, 1880)
Pitt v. Davison
3 Abb. Pr. 398 (New York Supreme Court, 1868)
Pitt v. Davison
37 N.Y. 270 (New York Court of Appeals, 1867)
Cazet v. . Hubbell
36 N.Y. 677 (New York Court of Appeals, 1867)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Barb. 227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-andrews-nysupct-1847.