Brown

Court of Claims

Brown

193 Ct. Cl. 1097, 1971 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 99, 1971 WL 4106

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedJanuary 8, 1971

DocketNo. 69-69

StatusPublished

This text of 193 Ct. Cl. 1097 (Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown, 193 Ct. Cl. 1097, 1971 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 99, 1971 WL 4106 (cc 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Owilian pay; res judicata; collateral estoppel. — On July 7, 1969, the court by order dismissed plaintiff’s amended petition without prejudice (188 Ct. Cl. 1164). On October 3, 1969, the court by order and on plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the order of July 7, 1969, granted plaintiff’s motion to the extent that plaintiff was allowed to file a new amended petition (189 Ct. Cl. 566). This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Upon consideration thereof, together with the opposition thereto, without oral argument the court concludes that plaintiff’s petition in this court is barred under the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel. (Brown v. Macy, 222 F. Supp. 639 (E.D. La. 1963), aff’d 340 F. 2d 115 (5th Cir. 1965)). On January 8, 1971, the court granted defendant’s motion and dismissed plaintiff’s second amended petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Owilian pay; res judicata; collateral estoppel. — On July 7, 1969, the court by order dismissed plaintiff’s amended petition without prejudice (188 Ct. Cl. 1164). On October 3, 1969, the court by order and on plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the order of July 7, 1969, granted plaintiff’s motion to the extent that plaintiff was allowed to file a new amended petition (189 Ct. Cl. 566). This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Upon consideration thereof, together with the opposition thereto, without oral argument the court concludes that plaintiff’s petition in this court is barred under the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel. (Brown v. Macy, 222 F. Supp. 639 (E.D. La. 1963), aff’d 340 F. 2d 115 (5th Cir. 1965)). On January 8, 1971, the court granted defendant’s motion and dismissed plaintiff’s second amended petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 Ct. Cl. 1097, 1971 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 99, 1971 WL 4106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-cc-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack