Home/Supreme Court of Florida/Browder v. Dacosta

Browder v. Dacosta

109 So. 448, 91 Fla. 1
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 22, 1925
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 109 So. 448 (Browder v. Dacosta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Browder v. Dacosta, 109 So. 448, 91 Fla. 1 (Fla. 1925).

Opinions

1. When an objection is sustained to a question, and the witness is not permitted to answer, unless it plainly appears from the question propounded that the answer of the witness would be relevant to the issues, it is the duty of the party propounding the question to make a sufficient proffer of what he intends to prove by the witness in answer to the objectionable question, so that the Court below, and subsequently this Court, can determine whether or not the proposed evidence would be material.

A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Duval County; John E. Hartridge, Referee.

On petition for rehearing.

*Page 3

Rehearing denied.

John T. G. Crawford, for Plaintiff in Error;

Cromwell Gibbons, for Defendant in Error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morrison v. State
818 So. 2d 432 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Adamo v. Manatee Condominium, Inc.
548 So. 2d 287 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Vail v. Townsend
504 N.E.2d 1183 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1985)
Sun Charm Ranch, Inc. v. City of Orlando
407 So. 2d 938 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Lattimore v. State
405 So. 2d 259 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Nelson v. Rever
287 So. 2d 710 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Metcalf v. Johnson
113 So. 2d 864 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Herman v. Edington
118 N.E.2d 865 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1954)
Exchange Nat. Bank of Winter Haven v. Smith
27 So. 2d 291 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1946)
Ideal Farms Drainage District v. Certain Lands
19 So. 2d 234 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1944)
Armour Company v. Lambdin
16 So. 2d 805 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1944)
Walker v. Landress
149 So. 545 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 So. 448, 91 Fla. 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/browder-v-dacosta-fla-1925.