Brou v. Martin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Brou v. Martin

987 So. 2d 249, 2008 La. LEXIS 1561, 2008 WL 2945968

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJuly 31, 2008

DocketNo. 2008-C-1685

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 987 So. 2d 249 (Brou v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brou v. Martin, 987 So. 2d 249, 2008 La. LEXIS 1561, 2008 WL 2945968 (La. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Brou, Charles; — Plaintiff; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Livingston, 21st Judicial District Court Div.C, Nos. 120,600; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2008-CE-1465.

Not considered. Not timely filed. The court of appeal rendered its judgment on Thursday, July 24, 2008 at 9:31a.m. Because the forty-eight hour time interval under La.Rev.Stat. 18:1409 G for filing this application ended on a legal holiday, relator’s application was due by noon on the next legal day. La.Rev.Stat. 18:1413. Although the application was mailed on Friday, July 25, 2008, the application was not received by the clerk of court until Monday, July 28, 2008 at 1:41 p.m.; the application is therefore untimely. See Frankl[250]*250in v. Secretary of State, 06-2538 (La.10/25/06), 939 So.2d 1266.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Brou, Charles; — Plaintiff; Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Livingston, 21st Judicial District Court Div.C, Nos. 120,600; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2008-CE-1465.

Not considered. Not timely filed. The court of appeal rendered its judgment on Thursday, July 24, 2008 at 9:31a.m. Because the forty-eight hour time interval under La.Rev.Stat. 18:1409 G for filing this application ended on a legal holiday, relator’s application was due by noon on the next legal day. La.Rev.Stat. 18:1413. Although the application was mailed on Friday, July 25, 2008, the application was not received by the clerk of court until Monday, July 28, 2008 at 1:41 p.m.; the application is therefore untimely. See Frankl[250]*250in v. Secretary of State, 06-2538 (La.10/25/06), 939 So.2d 1266.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

987 So. 2d 249, 2008 La. LEXIS 1561, 2008 WL 2945968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brou-v-martin-la-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack