Broomfield v. Sheehan
This text of 77 N.E. 525 (Broomfield v. Sheehan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The exceptions were duly filed, and the only question is whether “ notice thereof ” was given as required by law.
“ Exceptions shall be reduced to writing and filed with the clerk, and notice thereof shall be given to the adverse party . . . within twenty days after the verdict is rendered.” R. L. c. 178, § 106. Rule 47 of the Superior Court. The notice “ shall be in writing.” Rule 29 of the Superior Court.
A sending to the adverse party by mail of a copy of the bill of exceptions, without any signature of counsel, without any accompanying letter and without any “ memorandum or statement as to the filing thereof,” plainly comes far short of a notice that any bill, much less any properly signed bill, has been filed.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 N.E. 525, 190 Mass. 585, 1906 Mass. LEXIS 1133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/broomfield-v-sheehan-mass-1906.