Brooks v. Triguero
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1995
PETER G. BROOKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
AGUSTIN TEODORO TRIGUERO, d/b/a Argentimports, trading as Taft Auto Service,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:08-cv-03153-DKC)
Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 24, 2010
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Stephen Rothman, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellant.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Peter G. Brooks appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action based on res judicata. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Brooks v. Triguero, No. 8:08-cv-03153-DKC (D. Md. July 10 & 28,
2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brooks v. Triguero (Brooks v. Triguero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.