Brooks v. Triguero

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 24, 2010·No. 09-1995·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1995

PETER G. BROOKS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

AGUSTIN TEODORO TRIGUERO, d/b/a Argentimports, trading as Taft Auto Service,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (8:08-cv-03153-DKC)

Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 24, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Stephen Rothman, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellant.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Peter G. Brooks appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his civil action based on res judicata. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

Brooks v. Triguero, No. 8:08-cv-03153-DKC (D. Md. July 10 & 28,

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooks v. Triguero, (4th Cir. 2010).

Brooks v. Triguero (Brooks v. Triguero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.