Brooks v. Triguero

Fourth Circuit

Brooks v. Triguero

379 F. App'x 296

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 24, 2010·No. No. 09-1995·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Peter G. Brooks appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action based on res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 'stated by the district court. Brooks v. Triguero, No. 8:08-cv-03153-DKC (D.Md. July 10 & July 28, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Peter G. Brooks appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action based on res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 'stated by the district court. Brooks v. Triguero, No. 8:08-cv-03153-DKC (D.Md. July 10 & July 28, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Brooks v. Triguero, 379 F. App'x 296 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

379 F. App'x 296 (Brooks v. Triguero) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.