Brooks v. Titus

1933 OK 340, 23 P.2d 379, 164 Okla. 207, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 809
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedMay 31, 1933
Docket23406
StatusPublished

This text of 1933 OK 340 (Brooks v. Titus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brooks v. Titus, 1933 OK 340, 23 P.2d 379, 164 Okla. 207, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 809 (Okla. 1933).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A judgment was rendered on the 17th day of July, 1931, and thereafter an order overruling motion for new trial was entered on the 9th day of September, 1931, and 60 days in which to make and serve case-made was taken.

On the 9th day of October, 1931. 60 days was granted from October 9th in which to make and serve case-made. On the 7th day of December, 1931, 30 days from December 7, 1931, was granted in which to make and serve case-made; on January 6, 1932, the court entered its order allowing 30 days in addition to the time theretofore allowed, which 30 days expired on the 5th day of February, 1932.

*208 Thereafter, on tile 6th clay of February, 3932, the court purported to grant additional 30 days in which to make and serve ease-made.'

Under the holdings of this court, such order was void and of no effect, and a case-made served thereunder grants no authority to this court to review the errors therein contained. Hensley v. State, 121 Okla. 47, 247 P. 376.

The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aztec Oil Co. v. Dague
247 P. 376 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1926)
Hensley v. State
1926 OK 559 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1933 OK 340, 23 P.2d 379, 164 Okla. 207, 1933 Okla. LEXIS 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-titus-okla-1933.