Aztec Oil Co. v. Dague

247 P. 376, 121 Okla. 47
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided June 15, 1926·No. 17324·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Motion for new trial was overruled on the 19th day of October, 1925, and plaintiff in error gave notice of appeal and was given 45 days from date of order in which to serve case-made. This time expired on the 3rd day of December, 1925. Case-made w,as not served within this time, and on the 4th day of December, 1925, the iconrt made a further order of extension. Defendant in error moves the court to dismiss appeal on tlie ground that 'the trial court was without jurisdiction to make the order of December 4, 1925, for the reason that the time granted .previously had expired.

Where the time for serving ease-made ■has expired, an order of extension made subsquent thereto is void, and this court is without jurisdiction to review the case on appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aztec Oil Co. v. Dague, 247 P. 376, 121 Okla. 47 (Okla. 1926).

247 P. 376 (Aztec Oil Co. v. Dague) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cherry v. State
1937 OK CR 95 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1937)
Brooks v. Titus
1933 OK 340 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1933)
Parker v. Rennie
1929 OK 173 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1929)
Kershaw v. Board of Com'rs of Muskogee County
1929 OK 112 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1929)
Steil v. Marshall
1928 OK 321 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1928)
Mooney v. State Ex Rel. Sullivan
1927 OK 224 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1927)