Brooks v. Duffell

23 Ga. 441
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 15, 1857·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

Benning, J.

delivering the opinion.

We do not see how to distinguish this case from Robinson & Wood, vs. King and others, 6 Ga., 539. In both cases the witnesses, when they subscribed the will, were where they could not be seen by the testator, a wall intervening in that case, a door-shutter in this.

We think, therefore, that the charge of the Court was wrong, and consequently, that there ought to be a new trial.

It is unnecessary to consider the other grounds of the motion for a new trial, they depend upon the evidence.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooks v. Duffell, 23 Ga. 441 (Ga. 1857).

23 Ga. 441 (Brooks v. Duffell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Glenn v. Mann
214 S.E.2d 911 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1975)
Estate of Fleishman
1 Coffey 18 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1892)