Brooks v. Duffell
This text of 23 Ga. 441 (Brooks v. Duffell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court. —
delivering the opinion.
We do not see how to distinguish this case from Robinson & Wood, vs. King and others, 6 Ga., 539. In both cases the witnesses, when they subscribed the will, were where they could not be seen by the testator, a wall intervening in that case, a door-shutter in this.
We think, therefore, that the charge of the Court was wrong, and consequently, that there ought to be a new trial.
It is unnecessary to consider the other grounds of the motion for a new trial, they depend upon the evidence.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 Ga. 441, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-duffell-ga-1857.