Brooks v. Duffell
23 Ga. 441
Opinion
By the Court. —
delivering the opinion.
We do not see how to distinguish this case from Robinson & Wood, vs. King and others, 6 Ga., 539. In both cases the witnesses, when they subscribed the will, were where they could not be seen by the testator, a wall intervening in that case, a door-shutter in this.
We think, therefore, that the charge of the Court was wrong, and consequently, that there ought to be a new trial.
It is unnecessary to consider the other grounds of the motion for a new trial, they depend upon the evidence.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brooks v. Duffell, 23 Ga. 441 (Ga. 1857).
23 Ga. 441 (Brooks v. Duffell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Glenn v. Mann
214 S.E.2d 911 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1975)
Estate of Fleishman
1 Coffey 18 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1892)