Brooks v. Brooks
This text of 146 Misc. 335 (Brooks v. Brooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Final order unanimously reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs to appellant. It is conceded that defendant’s original entry upon the premises was lawful, and, therefore, she was not an intruder or a squatter within the provisions of subdivision 4 of section 1411 of the Civil Practice Act. (6 Wait N. Y. Prac. [3d ed.] 300, and cases cited; Matter of Stockwell v. Washburn, 59 Misc. 543; Frazier v. Cropsey, 124 id. 367; Williams v. Alt, 186 App. Div. 235; affd., 226 N. Y. 283.)
All concur; present, MacCrate, Lewis and Johnston, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
146 Misc. 335, 261 N.Y.S. 211, 1932 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brooks-v-brooks-nyappterm-1932.