Home/New York Court of Appeals/Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. City of New York

Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. City of New York

438 N.E.2d 1113, 56 N.Y.2d 881, 453 N.Y.S.2d 398, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3492
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 10, 1982·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

[883]*883OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, on the reasoning of Justice Leonard H. Sandler’s opinion in Teleprompter Corp. v City of New York (82 AD2d 145), to which we add only that the conclusion there reached is strengthened in the present case by the express requirement in section 61 of the agreement between the city and petitioner’s predecessor, New York and Richmond Gas Company, that on merger or consolidation of the predecessor, the successor corporation (petitioner) agree to “a method of limiting deductions under” the section of the Real Property Tax Law here in issue.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. City of New York, 438 N.E.2d 1113, 56 N.Y.2d 881, 453 N.Y.S.2d 398, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3492 (N.Y. 1982).

438 N.E.2d 1113 (Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Dissolution of Validation Review Associates, Inc.
223 A.D.2d 134 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Forty-Seventh-Fifth Co. v. Nektalov
225 A.D.2d 343 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
City Mattress v. Board of Assessment Review
166 Misc. 2d 79 (New York Supreme Court, 1995)
Consolidated Edison Co. v. City of New York
92 A.D.2d 484 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)