Brock v. Duhe
This text of 521 So. 2d 1162 (Brock v. Duhe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Brock, Barbara; Brock, James; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, Nos. 59570, 57994; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW88-0101.
Granted. The ruling of the Court of Appeal dismissing relator’s application as stale, is reversed. The application was filed within the period fixed by the trial court which had authority to set and to extend time limits under Rule 4-3 of the Uniform Rules-Courts of Appeal. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeal for consideration of the application.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
521 So. 2d 1162, 1988 La. LEXIS 993, 1988 WL 24800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brock-v-duhe-la-1988.