Brock v. Duhe

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Brock v. Duhe

521 So. 2d 1162, 1988 La. LEXIS 993, 1988 WL 24800

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 25, 1988·No. No. 88-CC-0520·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

In re Brock, Barbara; Brock, James; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, Nos. 59570, 57994; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW88-0101.

Granted. The ruling of the Court of Appeal dismissing relator’s application as stale, is reversed. The application was filed within the period fixed by the trial court which had authority to set and to extend time limits under Rule 4-3 of the Uniform Rules-Courts of Appeal. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeal for consideration of the application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Brock, Barbara; Brock, James; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, Nos. 59570, 57994; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW88-0101.

Granted. The ruling of the Court of Appeal dismissing relator’s application as stale, is reversed. The application was filed within the period fixed by the trial court which had authority to set and to extend time limits under Rule 4-3 of the Uniform Rules-Courts of Appeal. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeal for consideration of the application.

Brock v. Duhe, 521 So. 2d 1162, 1988 La. LEXIS 993, 1988 WL 24800 (La. 1988).

Pincite

521 So. 2d 1162 (Brock v. Duhe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related