Broadnax-Bey v. Galley

Fourth Circuit

Broadnax-Bey v. Galley

46 F. App'x 723

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 27, 2002·No. No. 02-6794·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Selwyn Broadnax-Bey seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Broadnax Bey has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Broadnax v. Galley, No. CA-02-949-S (D.Md. May 6, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Selwyn Broadnax-Bey seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that Broadnax Bey has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Broadnax v. Galley, No. CA-02-949-S (D.Md. May 6, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Broadnax-Bey v. Galley, 46 F. App'x 723 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

46 F. App'x 723 (Broadnax-Bey v. Galley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related