Brkti Zerabruk Kahsay v. U S Immigration & Customs Enforcement

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana
DecidedMay 11, 2026
Docket3:26-cv-00885
StatusUnknown

This text of Brkti Zerabruk Kahsay v. U S Immigration & Customs Enforcement (Brkti Zerabruk Kahsay v. U S Immigration & Customs Enforcement) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brkti Zerabruk Kahsay v. U S Immigration & Customs Enforcement, (W.D. La. 2026).

Opinion

a UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

BRKTI ZERABRUK KAHSAY #A221- CIVIL DOCKET NO. 3:26-CV-00885 SEC P 388-797, Petitioner

VERSUS JUDGE DAVID C. JOSEPH

U S IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES ENFORCEMENT, Respondents

MEMORANDUM ORDER Before the Court is a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (ECF No. 1) filed by pro se Petitioner Brkti Zerabruk Kahsay ("Zerabruk Kahsay"), an immigration detainee at the Richwood Correctional Center in Monroe, Louisiana. Zerabruk Kahsay seeks release from detention. A court may order a respondent to file an answer, motion, or other response, in its discretion. 28 U.S.C. § 2243; Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; , 552 U.S. 264, 278 (2008); , 6:18-CV-00544, 2018 WL 4869383, at *1 (W.D. La. 2018)1. And

1 Under Rule 1(b), the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases also apply to § 2241 habeas cases. , 2008 WL 835764, *2 (E.D. Cal. 2008); , 162 F. Supp. 2d 575, 577 (N.D. Tex. 2001); , 952 F. Supp. 348 (S.D. W.Va. 1997); , 20-CV-449, 2020 WL 1848073, at *1 (E.D. La. Apr. 13, 2020) (“District courts are therefore free to apply these rules to habeas petitions brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241”). this Court has determined that a 21 day briefing schedule is reasonable and appropriate in similar cases. Accordingly, to determine whether Zerabruk Kahsay is entitled to relief, THE CLERK IS DIRECTED to serve a summons, a copy of the Petition (ECF No. 1), and a copy of this Order, by certified mail, on: (1) the United States through the United States Attorney for the Western District of Louisiana; (2) the United States Attorney General; (3) DHS/ICE through its Office of General Counsel; and by regular mail on (4) the Warden where Zerabruk Kahsay is detained. IT IS ORDERED that a Response be filed within 21 days following the date of service of the Petition on the United States Attorney for the Western District of Louisiana, with summary judgment evidence regarding the lawfulness of her detention. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall have seven days following the filing of Respondents’ answer to reply. After the record is complete and delays have run, the Court will determine if genuine issues of material fact exist, which preclude summary judgment and necessitate an evidentiary hearing. If no hearing is necessary, a Report and Recommendation will be issued without further notice. SIGNED on Monday, May 11, 2026. Hl ry | ~ JOSEPH H.L. PEREZ-MONTES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wyant v. Edwards
952 F. Supp. 348 (S.D. West Virginia, 1997)
Castillo v. Pratt
162 F. Supp. 2d 575 (N.D. Texas, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Brkti Zerabruk Kahsay v. U S Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brkti-zerabruk-kahsay-v-u-s-immigration-customs-enforcement-lawd-2026.