Britt v. Department of Professional Regulation

478 So. 2d 1119, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2516, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16725
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 13, 1985·No. No. BH-180·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR ORDER TO TRANSMIT AND SUPPLEMENT RECORD

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion for an order that the record be transmitted is granted. The clerk for the agency shall forward the record on appeal on receipt of payment herein provided. The transcripts in question were on file with the clerk of the lower tribunal when the notice of appeal was filed; appellant therefore is not the “designating party” for purposes of assessing the costs of transcription. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.200(b)(1). The clerk shall impose charge of $2 per volume for the transcripts of the final hearing. Section 28.24, Florida Statutes (1983), as amended by Chapter 85-249, Laws of Florida (1985), and Fla.R.App.P. 9.200(d)(1)(A).

The motion to supplement the record on appeal with the transcript of the July 1, 1985, hearing before the Board of Medical Examiners is granted. Appellant shall have the supplemental record forwarded and filed in this cause within 15 days from the date of this order.

SHIVERS, WENTWORTH and WIG-GINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Britt v. Department of Professional Regulation, 478 So. 2d 1119, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2516, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16725 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

478 So. 2d 1119 (Britt v. Department of Professional Regulation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

STATE, DHRS v. Southpointe Pharmacy
636 So. 2d 1377 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Gretz v. Department of Labor & Employment Security
25 Fla. Supp. 2d 248 (State of Florida Division of Administrative Hearings, 1987)
State v. Alfonso
478 So. 2d 1119 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)