Britt v. Buffalo Municipal Housing Authority

126 A.D.3d 1413, 3 N.Y.S.3d 706
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 20, 2015·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Diane Y. Devlin, J.), entered February 6, 2013. The order denied the motion of plaintiff for recusal.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff contends on appeal that Supreme Court erred in denying her recusal motion. It is well established that, “[a]bsent a legal disqualification under Judiciary Law § 14, a Trial Judge is the sole arbiter of recusal ... A court’s decision in this respect may not be overturned unless it was an abuse of discretion” (People v Moreno, 70 NY2d 403, 405-406 [1987]). Contrary to plaintiffs contention, we conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion (cf. People v Warren, 100 AD3d 1399, 1400 [2012]). Plaintiffs allegations that the court exhibited bias in favor of defendants and prejudice against her are contradicted by the record.

Present — Scudder, P.J., Centra, Peradotto, Carni and Sconiers, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Britt v. Buffalo Municipal Housing Authority, 126 A.D.3d 1413, 3 N.Y.S.3d 706 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

126 A.D.3d 1413 (Britt v. Buffalo Municipal Housing Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Moreno
516 N.E.2d 200 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Warren
100 A.D.3d 1399 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)