Britt v. Buffalo Municipal Housing Authority

109 A.D.3d 1193, 971 N.Y.S.2d 912
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 27, 2013·No. Appeal No. 1·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Diane Y. Devlin, J), entered December 8, 2011. The order, among other things, granted the cross motions of defendants to amend their answers to assert affirmative defenses of res judicata and collateral estoppel.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988, 988 [1988]; Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1978]; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Present — Scudder, PJ., Fahey, Sconiers and Valentino, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Britt v. Buffalo Municipal Housing Authority, 109 A.D.3d 1193, 971 N.Y.S.2d 912 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

109 A.D.3d 1193 (Britt v. Buffalo Municipal Housing Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Roberts & Roberts, Inc.
63 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Hughes v. Nussbaumer
140 A.D.2d 988 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)