Brightwell v. Hutchinson

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: July 23, 2003
• Docket: 03-6376
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6376

DAVID BRIGHTWELL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD HUTCHINSON, Warden, Maryland House of Corrections; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA- 02-2539-DKC)

Submitted: July 8, 2003 Decided: July 23, 2003

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Brightwell, Appellant Pro Se. Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

David Brightwell seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that

Brightwell has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322

(2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED