Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bright v. State

Bright v. State

691 So. 2d 594, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3907, 1997 WL 178911
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bright v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 8915 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 16, 1997·No. No. 96-3533·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order by which the trial court denied the appellant’s Florida rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion. The purported claims of newly discovered evidence of prosecutorial misconduct were properly denied because they were legally insufficient to state colorable claims. The remaining claims were properly denied as successive.

AFFIRMED.

ALLEN, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bright v. State, 691 So. 2d 594, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 3907, 1997 WL 178911 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

691 So. 2d 594 (Bright v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.