Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Bright v. State

Bright v. State

675 So. 2d 260, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6651, 1996 WL 339122
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 21, 1996
DocketNo. 96-287
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 675 So. 2d 260 (Bright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bright v. State, 675 So. 2d 260, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6651, 1996 WL 339122 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal, we affirm the judgment and sentence imposed, but strike the imposition of public defender’s fees because the record does not establish that appellant was advised of his right to contest the amount of the fee. See Allmond v. State, 668 So.2d 1120 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). On remand, the trial court may reconsider the imposition of the fee after compliance with Rule 3.720(d)(1), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

JUDGMENT and SENTENCE AFFIRMED; PUBLIC DEFENDER’S FEE STRICKEN; and REMANDED.

PETERSON, C.J., and DAUKSCH and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. State
686 So. 2d 749 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
675 So. 2d 260, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6651, 1996 WL 339122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bright-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.