Briggs v. State

936 So. 2d 789, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14864, 2006 WL 2557968
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 6, 2006·No. No. 4D05-2252·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

WARNER, J.

We affirm appellant’s sentence for violation of probation and conclude that the trial court’s oral pronouncement was unambiguous that appellant’s sentence was forty-eight months additional prison time after considering credit for time served in prison prior to the violation of probation. [790]*790Although there was a scrivener’s error in reducing this pronouncement to writing, the oral pronouncement controls over the written sentence. See Ashley v. State, 850 So.2d 1265, 1268 (Fla.2003). We therefore affirm but remand to correct the written sentence to reflect the oral pronouncement. Before correcting the sentence, the court will need to determine the exact credit for time served.

KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Briggs v. State, 936 So. 2d 789, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 14864, 2006 WL 2557968 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

936 So. 2d 789 (Briggs v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Christopher L. Kee v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024
JOSE E. MORALES v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2020
C.G.K. v. State
150 So. 3d 1203 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
C.G.K., a child v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014