C.G.K., a child v. State

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 12, 2014
Docket4D13-3436, 4D13-3440, 4D13-3441, 4D13-3442, 4D13-3443 and 4D13-3444
StatusPublished

This text of C.G.K., a child v. State (C.G.K., a child v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
C.G.K., a child v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT July Term 2014

C.G.K., a child, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Nos. 4D13-3436, 4D13-3440, 4D13-3441, 4D13-3442, 4D13-3443 and 4D13-3444

[November 12, 2014]

Consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Lawrence M. Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 432011CJ000462A, 432011CJ000648A, 432011CJ000649, 432011CJ000650A, 432013CJ000115A, and 432013CJ000163A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Emily Ross-Booker, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allen R. Geesey, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without discussion appellant’s withheld adjudication of delinquency and delinquency disposition for violation of probation. However, we remand for the trial court to correct the written order to reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncement of disposition. At the violation of probation hearing, the trial court’s oral pronouncement was that it would withhold adjudication. However, it appears that due to a scrivener’s error, the trial court’s disposition indicates that “the child is adjudicated delinquent.” In criminal proceedings, where a trial court’s oral pronouncement is unambiguous, the oral pronouncement controls over the written order. See Briggs v. State, 936 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

Affirmed and remanded for correction of written order.

WARNER, MAY and CONNER, JJ., concur. * * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Briggs v. State
936 So. 2d 789 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
C.G.K., a child v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cgk-a-child-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.