Briesnick v. Briesnick

Supreme Court of Georgia

Briesnick v. Briesnick

99 Ga. 185

DecidedJuly 20, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 99 Ga. 185 (Briesnick v. Briesnick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Briesnick v. Briesnick, 99 Ga. 185 (Ga. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Callaway, J.

The evidence, though decidedly conflicting, warranted a finding that the plaintiff was entitled to alimony, including attorney’s fees; the charge, as a whole, very fully and fairly submitted to the jury the issues in controversy, and even if it was in some respects not entirely accurate, it contained no error which would justify this court in setting aside the verdict, the amount of which was not’so large as to necessitate a holding that it was excessive. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Callaway, J.

The evidence, though decidedly conflicting, warranted a finding that the plaintiff was entitled to alimony, including attorney’s fees; the charge, as a whole, very fully and fairly submitted to the jury the issues in controversy, and even if it was in some respects not entirely accurate, it contained no error which would justify this court in setting aside the verdict, the amount of which was not’so large as to necessitate a holding that it was excessive. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 Ga. 185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/briesnick-v-briesnick-ga-1896.