Briesnick v. Briesnick
28 S.E. 154, 100 Ga. 57, 1896 Ga. LEXIS 534
Opinion
I intended to prepare an extended opinion and discuss, the questions presented by this record. Upon reflection, the head-notes are clear and explicit; any amount of authority can be easily produced to sustain the principles therein announced. There is no necessity that I should do-more. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Briesnick v. Briesnick, 28 S.E. 154, 100 Ga. 57, 1896 Ga. LEXIS 534 (Ga. 1896).
28 S.E. 154 (Briesnick v. Briesnick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Branch v. Branch
135 S.E.2d 269 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1964)
Blackburn v. Blackburn
41 S.E.2d 519 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)
Lankford v. Holton
197 Ga. 212 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Carpenter v. State Ex Rel. Hains
24 S.E.2d 404 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Snider v. Snider
9 S.E.2d 654 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Villa v. District Court of San Juan
45 P.R. 852 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1933)
Villa v. Corte de Distrito de San Juan
45 P.R. Dec. 879 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1933)
Heflinger v. Heflinger
159 S.E. 242 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Lewis v. Theodoro
126 S.E. 158 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Christian v. Christian
111 S.E. 809 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Wilkins v. Wilkins
91 S.E. 415 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1917)
Van Dyke v. Van Dyke
54 S.E. 537 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Wester v. Martin
42 S.E. 81 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Nisbet v. Tindall
41 S.E. 569 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)