Bridges v. State
750 So. 2d 782, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2309
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bridges v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11897 →
Opinion
[783]*783 CONFESSION OF ERROR
Upon the State’s proper confession of error, we reverse the denial of defendant’s 3.800 motion and remand for resentencing. See Wick v. State, 651 So.2d 765 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)(combination of probation and prison term must not exceed statutory maximum); see also Martell v. State, 676 So.2d 1030, 1031 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)(Rule 3.850, not Rule 3.800 is “the proper means to challenge a court’s failure to order a presentence investigation”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bridges v. State, 750 So. 2d 782, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2309 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
750 So. 2d 782 (Bridges v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wick v. State
651 So. 2d 765 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Martell v. State
676 So. 2d 1030 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)