Bridges v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bridges v. State

726 So. 2d 862, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2207, 1999 WL 95047

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bridges v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11897 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 26, 1999·No. No. 99-294·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Bridges seeks a belated appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(j)(2). Bridges’ petition fails to comply with the requirements of the rule. There is no allegation of the date and nature of the lower tribunal’s order sought to be reviewed, the name of the tribunal, or the nature, disposition and dates of all previous proceedings. Therefore, we dismiss the petition without prejudice to file a petition which conforms with Rule 9.140(j).

DISMISSED.

GRIFFIN, C.J., PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Joseph Bridges seeks a belated appeal pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(j)(2). Bridges’ petition fails to comply with the requirements of the rule. There is no allegation of the date and nature of the lower tribunal’s order sought to be reviewed, the name of the tribunal, or the nature, disposition and dates of all previous proceedings. Therefore, we dismiss the petition without prejudice to file a petition which conforms with Rule 9.140(j).

DISMISSED.

GRIFFIN, C.J., PETERSON and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Bridges v. State, 726 So. 2d 862, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2207, 1999 WL 95047 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

726 So. 2d 862 (Bridges v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.