Bridge v. Excelsior Manuf'g Co.

12 F. 928
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bridge v. Excelsior Manuf'g Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 F. 351
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 15, 1881·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Bradley

delivered the opinion of the court affirming the decree: Cam movements, and others of like character, producing simultaneous operations, according to the needs of the case, such as opening valves on steam-engine, are in such common use that it requires but little invention to adapt them to a particular case; and, when used for an automatic device, the patentee is only entitled to the precise device which he has described and claimed in his patent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bridge v. Excelsior Manuf'g Co., 12 F. 928 (U.S. 1881).

12 F. 928 (Bridge v. Excelsior Manuf'g Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.