Bridge v. Excelsior Manuf'g Co.

12 F. 351, 21 O.G. 1955
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 8, 1882·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Bradley

delivered the opinion of the court affirming the decree of the circuit court.

Letters patent claiming, “ in combination with a stove door, a hinged shelf, fitted to fall outward and down automatically when the oven door is opened and to be raised up by closing the oven door, adapted to operate on it for that purpose,” covers only the specific devices for raising and lowering the hinged shelf, and as both devices claimed operate upon the same principle precisely [352] as that which has been used for a long time for other similar purposes, and as defendants use a different device, they are not guilty of infringement.

B.. H. Parkinson, for appellants. S. S. Boyd, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bridge v. Excelsior Manuf'g Co., 12 F. 351, 21 O.G. 1955 (U.S. 1882).

12 F. 351 (Bridge v. Excelsior Manuf'g Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Worden v. Searls
121 U.S. 14 (Supreme Court, 1887)
Norton v. Haight
22 F. 787 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1884)