Brewster v. Doane

2 Hill & Den. 537
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1842
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Hill & Den. 537 (Brewster v. Doane) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brewster v. Doane, 2 Hill & Den. 537 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1842).

Opinion

By the Court,

Bronson, J.

The rule is, that entries and memoranda made in the usual course of business, by nota[538]*538ries, clerks and other persons, may be received in • evidence after the death of the person who made them. (Halliday v. Martinet, 20 John. 168; Butler v. Wright, 2 Wend. 369; Hart v. Wilson, id. 513; Nichols v. Goldsmith, 7 id. 160; Cowen & Hill’s Notes to Phil. Ev. 674—676.) But if the person who made the enti-y be still living, though out of the state, he must be called, or examined on commission—otherwise his entry or memorandum cannot be received. (Wilbur v. Selden, 6 Cowen, 162; Merrill v. Ithaca & Owego R, R. Co., 16 Wend. 595.) Entries and memoranda made by deceased persons in the usual course, of business, though not the most satisfactory kind of evidence, are received from the necessity of the case; and the evidence is not admissible where that necessity does not exist.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Halliday v. Martinet
20 Johns. 168 (New York Supreme Court, 1822)
Butler v. Wright
2 Wend. 369 (New York Supreme Court, 1829)
Merrill v. Ithaca & Owego Rail Road
16 Wend. 586 (New York Supreme Court, 1837)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Hill & Den. 537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brewster-v-doane-nysupct-1842.