Brewer v. Erwin

705 P.2d 242, 75 Or. App. 132
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedSeptember 20, 1985
DocketA7604 04893; A7709 12910 (Supplemental); CA 19391
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 705 P.2d 242 (Brewer v. Erwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brewer v. Erwin, 705 P.2d 242, 75 Or. App. 132 (Or. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendants petition the Supreme Court for review of our recent opinion clarifying our original decision. Brewer v. Erwin, 70 Or App 709, 690 P2d 1122 (1984). We treat the petition for review as a petition for reconsideration. ORAP 10.10(1). We grant the petition and modify our decision to provide that interest on the judgment for plaintiff shall run from October 21, 1980, the date of the original judgment, rather than from June 20, 1980, the date of the jury verdict. ORS 82.010(3). With this modification, we adhere to our previous opinion.1

Reconsideration granted; previous opinion adhered to as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Ventris
50 P.3d 1274 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2002)
Central Oregon Fabricators, Inc. v. Hudspeth
998 P.2d 740 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2000)
Averill v. Red Lion
850 P.2d 1173 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1993)
Hay v. Oregon Department of Transportation
719 P.2d 860 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1986)
Hay v. Department of Transportation
705 P.2d 240 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
705 P.2d 242, 75 Or. App. 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brewer-v-erwin-orctapp-1985.