Brewer v. City of Springfield

97 Mass. 152
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided September 15, 1867·Published·Cited by 26 cases

Opinion

Bigelow, C. J.

We cannot take cognizance in equity of the case stated in the bill. Until the plaintiffs have been compelled to pay the tax which they allege to have been illegally assessed upon them, they have suffered no wrong; when they have paid it, they can recover it back by an action at law, which would furnish them an adequate and complete remedy. We can see no ground on which a single taxpayer who has been illegally assessed can ask for the interference of a court of equity. Certainly none is stated in the bill, nor has the counsel for the plaintiffs suggested any.

In determining the case on this ground, we do not mean it to be understood that we doubt the legality of the assessment set forth in the bill. For aught that we can see, it was in all respects regular and in conformity to law. Springfield v. Gay 12 Allen, 612. Bill dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brewer v. City of Springfield, 97 Mass. 152 (Mass. 1867).

97 Mass. 152 (Brewer v. City of Springfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Proprietors of the Cemetery v. Unemployment Compensation Commission
16 N.E.2d 666 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1938)
Cummings v. Garner
182 N.W. 9 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1921)
Warr v. Collector of Taxes
234 Mass. 279 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1920)
White v. Multnomah County
144 P. 1193 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1914)
Graham v. City of Grand Rapids
146 N.W. 248 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1914)
Welch v. City of Boston
94 N.E. 271 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1911)
Commonwealth v. Allen
89 N.E. 918 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1909)
Equitable Guarantee & Trust Co. v. Donahoe
8 Del. Ch. 422 (Court of Chancery of Delaware, 1899)
People v. Reclamation District No. 136
53 P. 1085 (California Supreme Court, 1898)
Linehan Railway Transfer Co. v. Pendergrass
70 F. 1 (Eighth Circuit, 1895)
M. Golden & Co. v. City of Guthrie
1895 OK 15 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1895)
Pacific Exp. Co. v. Seibert
44 F. 310 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri, 1890)
Heick v. Voight
11 N.E. 306 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1887)
Williams v. County Court of Grant Co.
26 W. Va. 488 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1885)
In Re Harris
14 R.I. 637 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1885)
Schulenberg-Boeckeler Lumber Co. v. Town of Hayward
20 F. 422 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Wisconsin, 1884)
Second Nat. Bank of Titusville v. Caldwell
13 F. 429 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1882)
Price v. Kramer
4 Colo. 546 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1879)
Brooks v. Howland
58 N.H. 98 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1877)
Thomas v. Gain
35 Mich. 155 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1876)