Bressingham v. Jamaica Hospital Medical Center

17 A.D.3d 496, 793 N.Y.S.2d 176, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4083
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 18, 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 17 A.D.3d 496 (Bressingham v. Jamaica Hospital Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bressingham v. Jamaica Hospital Medical Center, 17 A.D.3d 496, 793 N.Y.S.2d 176, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4083 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (O’Donoghue, J.), dated October 17, 2003, as granted that branch of the cross motion of the defendant Jamaica Hospital Medical Center which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the cross motion of the defendant Jamaica Hospital Medical Center which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it is denied, and the complaint is reinstated insofar as asserted against that defendant.

The branch of the cross motion of defendant Jamaica Hospital Medical Center which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it, made more than 120 days after the filing of the note of issue, was untimely (see CPLR 3212 [a]) and should not have been entertained without a [497]*497showing of good cause for the delay (see Brill v City of New York, 2 NY3d 648 [2004]). There was no such showing here. While the pending motion of the codefendant, Pyrosignal & Suppression, Inc., for similar relief would have been a sufficient basis to consider the untimely motion had the motion and cross motion been nearly identical (see Boehme v A.P.P.L.E., A Program Planned for Life Enrichment, 298 AD2d 540, 541-542 [2002]; Miranda v Devlin, 260 AD2d 451 [1999]), they were not. Plorio, J.P., Cozier, Spolzino and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Turner v. Zito
2021 NY Slip Op 03775 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Shanoff v. Golyan
139 A.D.3d 932 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Bicounty Brokerage Corp. v. Burlington Insurance
101 A.D.3d 778 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Kim v. State Street Hospitality, LLC
94 A.D.3d 708 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
McCallister v. 200 Park, L.P.
92 A.D.3d 927 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Teitelbaum v. Crown Heights Ass'n
84 A.D.3d 935 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Homeland Insurance v. National Grange Mutual Insurance
84 A.D.3d 737 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Snolis v. Clare
81 A.D.3d 923 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Whitehead v. City of New York
79 A.D.3d 858 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Wysk v. New York City School Construction Authority
27 Misc. 3d 362 (New York Supreme Court, 2010)
Bickelman v. Herrill Bowling Corp.
49 A.D.3d 578 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Ferris v. Millman
17 Misc. 3d 898 (New York Supreme Court, 2007)
Ellman v. Village of Rhinebeck
41 A.D.3d 635 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Grande v. Peteroy
39 A.D.3d 590 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Filannino v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority
34 A.D.3d 280 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Fahrenholz v. Security Mutual Insurance
32 A.D.3d 1326 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Barca v. City of New York
13 Misc. 3d 464 (New York Supreme Court, 2006)
Osario v. BRF Construction Corp.
23 A.D.3d 202 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 A.D.3d 496, 793 N.Y.S.2d 176, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4083, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bressingham-v-jamaica-hospital-medical-center-nyappdiv-2005.