Brent v. Kupec

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6909

CHARLES BRENT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ROBERT KUPEC, Warden, Individually and in Official Capacity; PAUL HANDY, Administrative Judge; CALVIN WILSON, Hearing Officer; COUNSELOR COOPER, Classification Counselor, Individually and in Official Capacity; R. DRYDEN, Security Chief, Individually and in Official Capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-1-3746)

Submitted: November 30, 2005 Decided: December 16, 2005

Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Brent, Appellant Pro Se. David Phelps Kennedy, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Charles Brent appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brent v. Kupec,

No. CA-04-1-3746 (D. Md. May 5, 2005). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -