Brent Alan McLean v. Brad Livingston

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 26, 2017·No. 10-14-00191-CV·Published

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00191-CV

BRENT ALAN MCLEAN, Appellant v.

BRAD LIVINGSTON, ET AL, Appellee

From the 18th District Court Johnson County, Texas Trial Court No. C201400101

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Brent Alan McLean, a prison inmate, appealed the trial court’s dismissal of

McLean’s civil lawsuit. We dismissed his appeal for failure to comply with Chapter 14

of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code1 and denied rehearing.2 The Texas

Supreme Court reversed our judgment and remanded McLean’s appeal back to us for

1 McLean v. Livingston, No. 10-14-00191-CV, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 7826 (App.—Waco 2014).

2 McLean v. Livingston, 456 S.W.3d 358 (Tex. App.—Waco 2015, order). review.3

Within the next 5 months, the Texas Supreme Court’s mandate issued, the

appellate record was filed in this Court, and McLean filed his appellate brief. But, before

appellees could file a brief, we were informed by appellees through a motion for

extension of time to file appellees’ brief that McLean had absconded while being released

to a halfway house. Later, after we issued an order on January 25, 2017, requiring service

of appellees’ motion on McLean at all of his known addresses, including an address

McLean had provided to us earlier, we received a telephone call from McLean informing

us that he knew about the January 25, 2017 order and that he was no longer in Texas but

would not provide his address.

Not surprisingly, appellees could not serve their motion on McLean. By Order

dated March 8, 2017, we ordered McLean to file a status report within 14 days that

provided an address at which he could be served with pleadings, orders, and notices and

warned McLean that the failure to respond to the order would result in the dismissal of

his appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). We mailed this order

to McLean at his last known prison address, the last address provided to us by McLean,

and the address of the halfway house to which McLean was reportedly released.4 More

than fourteen days have passed, and McLean has failed to respond to our order.

3 McLean v. Livingston, 486 S.W.3d 561 (Tex. 2016).

4 The letter to the halfway house was returned on March 21, 2017 and marked “Return to Sender/Undeliverable as Addressed/Unable to Forward.” The letter to the address McLean provided to us was returned March 20, 2017 and marked “Return to Sender/Refused/Unable to Forward.” The letter to McLean at his prison address has not been returned.

McLean v. Livingston Page 2 Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Id.

Absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing fees at the

time a document is presented for filing. TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to TEX. R. APP.

P., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007). See also TEX. R. APP.

P. 5; 10TH TEX. APP. (Waco) Loc. R. 5; TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207(b); 51.208; §

51.941(a) (West 2013). Under the circumstances of this case, we suspend the rule and

order the Clerk to write off all unpaid filing fees in this case. TEX. R. APP. P. 2.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Appeal dismissed Opinion delivered and filed April 26, 2017 [CV06]

McLean v. Livingston Page 3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brent Alan McLean v. Brad Livingston, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Brent Alan McLean v. Brad Livingston (Brent Alan McLean v. Brad Livingston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brent Alan McLean v. Brad Livingston
486 S.W.3d 561 (Texas Supreme Court, 2016)
McLean v. Livingston
456 S.W.3d 358 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2015)