Brent Alan McLean v. Brad Livingston

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 21, 2016
Docket10-14-00191-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Brent Alan McLean v. Brad Livingston (Brent Alan McLean v. Brad Livingston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brent Alan McLean v. Brad Livingston, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00191-CV

BRENT ALAN MCLEAN, Appellant v.

BRAD LIVINGSTON, ET AL, Appellee

From the 18th District Court Johnson County, Texas Trial Court No. C201400101

ORDER

Brent Alan McLean, a prison inmate, appealed the trial court’s dismissal of

McLean’s civil lawsuit. We dismissed his appeal for failure to comply with Chapter 14

of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. See McLean v. Livingston, No. 10-14-00191-

CV, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 7826 (App.—Waco 2014), rev and rem, 486 S.W.3d 560 (Tex.

2016). We denied rehearing, and McLean sought review by the Texas Supreme Court.

McLean was represented by counsel during the proceedings at the Texas Supreme Court. When the Court reversed our judgment, counsel for McLean did not withdraw from

representing McLean.

By letter dated August 4, 2016, the clerk of this Court notified counsel that the

Court became aware of counsel’s representation and informed counsel that the Court

would no longer communicate directly with McLean but would communicate with

counsel. Counsel was also notified that McLean’s brief was due on June 30, 2016.

In response to this letter, counsel filed a motion to withdraw and McLean sent us

a letter, both of which explain that counsel’s agreement to represent McLean only applied

to the proceedings before the Texas Supreme Court, not to any other proceedings,

including a proceeding in this Court in the event that the Texas Supreme Court reversed

and remanded this Court’s judgment.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.

We now address motions that McLean filed on his own which we have not yet

disposed.

McLean’s motion to withdraw the clerk’s record, filed on June 29, 2016, is granted.

This Court’s appellate records are now filed in an electronic format. Because McLean

contends he has no access to a computer, a hard copy of the clerk’s record in this appeal

is enclosed with this order. The clerk’s record must be preserved in the condition it has

been sent to McLean. It may not be disassembled or taken apart for any reason, and it

may not be marked on. The clerk’s record must be returned to the Court at the time

McLean v. Livingston Page 2 McLean’s brief is filed. If the record is not returned at the time McLean’s brief is filed,

the Court will dismiss this appeal.

McLean’s motion for extension of time to file his brief, filed on June 29, 2016, is

granted in part. McLean’s brief is due 90 days from the date of this order. This gives

McLean ample time to receive the clerk’s record from this Court, determine and research

the issues to be presented, and prepare and file his brief.

McLean’s motion to suspend the requirement of the number of copies of his brief,

filed on June 29, 2016, is granted. McLean is permitted to file an original of his brief only.

He must still, however, serve a copy of his brief on all parties to this appeal.

Finally, McLean’s motion for emergency injunction filed on July 22, 2016, is

denied.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Motion to withdraw as counsel granted Motion to withdraw record granted Motion for extension of time granted in part Motion to suspend granted Motion for emergency injunction denied Order issued and filed September 21, 2016

McLean v. Livingston Page 3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte N.C.
486 S.W.3d 560 (Texas Supreme Court, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Brent Alan McLean v. Brad Livingston, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brent-alan-mclean-v-brad-livingston-texapp-2016.