Brenda Ford v. Elaine Chapman

371 F. App'x 513
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 24, 2010
Docket09-10735
StatusUnpublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 371 F. App'x 513 (Brenda Ford v. Elaine Chapman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brenda Ford v. Elaine Chapman, 371 F. App'x 513 (5th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Brenda Lee Ford, federal prisoner # 26255-077, was sentenced to a 324-month term of imprisonment following a 1995 conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine and possession with intent to distribute cocaine. Ford has appealed the district court’s dismissal of her 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging the method used by the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to compute the good time credit against her sentence authorized by 18 U.S.C. § 3624(b).

Regardless whether Ford’s sentence is computed on the basis of the BOP’s interpretation of § 3624(b) or her own, Ford’s release is not imminent. In light of the “temporally distant and speculative nature of [Ford’s] claim,” she has failed to establish an “immediate injury” that would be redressed by the relief that she seeks. See Sample v. Morrison, 406 F.3d 310, 312 (5th Cir.2005). We conclude that Ford’s § 2241 petition is not ripe for review, 1 and *514 we dismiss the appeal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

1

. Under our case law, 18 U.S.C. § 3624(b) "makes clear that good time credit must be earned by a prisoner on an annual basis; it is not awarded in advance.” Sample, 406 F.3d at 312. Accordingly, a case alleging loss of good time credit becomes ripe when the alleged accrued credit creates an "immediate injury” to the prisoner that this court could redress.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Untitled Case
D. Arizona, 2026
Sharp v. Brown
N.D. West Virginia, 2024
Falcetta v. Rosalez
W.D. Texas, 2022
Ford v. Chapman
178 L. Ed. 2d 397 (Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
371 F. App'x 513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brenda-ford-v-elaine-chapman-ca5-2010.