Brazele v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Brazele v. State

86 Miss. 286

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided April 15, 1905·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Whiteield, O. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The indictment failed to charge that the defendant was “in any manner interested in the loss or gain of the said gaming table,” as required by the statute. This was a fatal omission.

The judgment is reversed, the demurrer sustained, the indictment quashed, and the defendant will be held to answer such proper indictment as may be hereafter preferred against him„

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whiteield, O. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The indictment failed to charge that the defendant was “in any manner interested in the loss or gain of the said gaming table,” as required by the statute. This was a fatal omission.

The judgment is reversed, the demurrer sustained, the indictment quashed, and the defendant will be held to answer such proper indictment as may be hereafter preferred against him„

Brazele v. State, 86 Miss. 286 (Mich. 1905).

Pincite

86 Miss. 286 (Brazele v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related