Brayley v. Kelly

25 Minn. 160, 1878 Minn. LEXIS 33
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided July 2, 1878·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Gtlfillan, C. J.

The verdict should be set aside on two grounds. First, the court erred in admitting the printed paper “Exhibit B.” There was nothing to verify it as made by plaintiff, or as coming from him. Eor aught that appears, it may have been made by defendant, or any one else not connected with plaintiff. Second, the transaction upon which defendant relies as a defence to the note sued on, was had with one Wise, and there is no evidence whatever that Wise was, either by previous appointment or subsequent ratification, the agent of the plaintiff.

Order reversed, and new trial ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brayley v. Kelly, 25 Minn. 160, 1878 Minn. LEXIS 33 (Mich. 1878).

25 Minn. 160 (Brayley v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McDonald v. New World Life Insurance
136 P. 702 (Washington Supreme Court, 1913)
Porter v. R. J. Boyd Paving & Construction Co.
112 S.W. 235 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1908)
Finnegan v. Lucy
32 N.E. 656 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1892)