Brayley v. Kelly
This text of 25 Minn. 160 (Brayley v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The verdict should be set aside on two grounds. First, the court erred in admitting the printed paper “Exhibit B.” There was nothing to verify it as made by plaintiff, or as coming from him. Eor aught that appears, it may have been made by defendant, or any one else not connected with plaintiff. Second, the transaction upon which defendant relies as a defence to the note sued on, was had with one Wise, and there is no evidence whatever that Wise was, either by previous appointment or subsequent ratification, the agent of the plaintiff.
Order reversed, and new trial ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 Minn. 160, 1878 Minn. LEXIS 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brayley-v-kelly-minn-1878.