Bray v. State
61 So. 3d 1188, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6362, 2011 WL 1680991
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bray v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6755 →
Opinion
The appellant has filed an appeal of an order striking his postconviction motion but granting him leave to amend. Such an order is not a final, appealable order. See Lee v. State, 939 So.2d 154, 155 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). Thus, we DISMISS the appeal. We deny as moot the appellant’s motion for extension of time to file an initial brief.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bray v. State, 61 So. 3d 1188, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6362, 2011 WL 1680991 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).
61 So. 3d 1188 (Bray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lee v. State
939 So. 2d 154 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)