Bray v. State

898 S.W.2d 37, 320 Ark. 510, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 279
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bray v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 322 Ark. 178
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided May 15, 1995·No. CR 95-436·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant, John Michael Bray, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, Robert W. Bush, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such admission of fault by an attorney in a criminal case is good cause to grant the motion. See Tarry v. State, 288 Ark. 172, 702 S.W.2d 904 (1986).

The motion is therefore granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bray v. State, 898 S.W.2d 37, 320 Ark. 510, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 279 (Ark. 1995).

898 S.W.2d 37 (Bray v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tarry v. State
702 S.W.2d 804 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1986)
State v. Neverls
702 S.W.2d 901 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1985)