Bray v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Bray v. State

898 S.W.2d 37, 320 Ark. 510, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 279

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedMay 15, 1995

DocketCR 95-436

StatusPublished

This text of 898 S.W.2d 37 (Bray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bray v. State, 898 S.W.2d 37, 320 Ark. 510, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 279 (Ark. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellant, John Michael Bray, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, Robert W. Bush, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such admission of fault by an attorney in a criminal case is good cause to grant the motion. See Tarry v. State, 288 Ark. 172, 702 S.W.2d 904 (1986).

The motion is therefore granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appellant, John Michael Bray, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, Robert W. Bush, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part. We find that such admission of fault by an attorney in a criminal case is good cause to grant the motion. See Tarry v. State, 288 Ark. 172, 702 S.W.2d 904 (1986).

The motion is therefore granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

898 S.W.2d 37, 320 Ark. 510, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bray-v-state-ark-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack