Braunfeld v. Gibbons
This text of 184 F. Supp. 352 (Braunfeld v. Gibbons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Abraham BRAUNFELD, Isaac Friedman, Alter Diament, S. David Friedman and Joseph R. Friedman, Plaintiffs,
v.
Thomas J. GIBBONS and Victor H. Blanc, Defendants.
United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.
Before HASTIE, Circuit Judge, GANEY, Chief District Judge, and EGAN, District Judge.
Final order dismissing amended complaint.
*353 PER CURIAM.
This cause having been submitted on the Amended Complaint and defendants' motion to dismiss that complaint; and this court finding itself in full accord with the reasoning and conclusions of another statutory court of this district in Two Guys From Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. McGinley, No. 25626, D.C.1959, 179 F.Supp. 944, concerning the constitutionality of Pennsylvania Act No. 212, 18 P.S. § 4699.10, approved August 10, 1959, prohibiting retail selling of enumerated commodities on Sunday; and the court finding nothing in the Amended Complaint herein to make the legal ruling in the aforesaid case No. 25626 inapplicable; it is this 16th day of December, 1959,
Ordered that the complaint herein seeking a permanent injunction against the enforcement of Pennsylvania Act No. 212, approved August 10, 1959, be and it is hereby dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
184 F. Supp. 352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braunfeld-v-gibbons-paed-1959.