Home/New York Supreme Court/Brater v. Andrews

Brater v. Andrews

81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 640
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brater v. Andrews. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 N.Y.S. 918 →
New York Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1893·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Per Curiam:

The notice of appeal was from

the final judgment, no appeal having been taken from the interlocutory judgment. The questions sought to be varied, therefore, are not before us for review, and the judgment must he affirmed, with costs.

Present — Yan Brunt, P. J., O’Brien and Follett, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brater v. Andrews, 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 640 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 640 (Brater v. Andrews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.