Brater v. Andrews
81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 640
This text of 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 640 (Brater v. Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brater v. Andrews, 81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 640 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
The notice of appeal was from
the final judgment, no appeal having been taken from the interlocutory judgment. The questions sought to be varied, therefore, are not before us for review, and the judgment must he affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
81 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 640, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brater-v-andrews-nysupct-1893.