Brater v. Andrews
26 N.Y.S. 918, 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 206, 74 Hun 640
Opinion
The notice of appeal was from the final judgment, no appeal having been taken from the interlocutory judgment. The questions sought to be raised, therefore, are not before us for review, and the judgment must be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brater v. Andrews, 26 N.Y.S. 918, 57 N.Y. St. Rep. 206, 74 Hun 640 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
26 N.Y.S. 918 (Brater v. Andrews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barber v. Rowe
200 A.D. 290 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)
Osborn v. . Cardeza
101 N.E. 806 (New York Court of Appeals, 1913)