Branning v. State

2014 Ark. 58
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedFebruary 6, 2014
DocketCR-13-332
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 2014 Ark. 58 (Branning v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Branning v. State, 2014 Ark. 58 (Ark. 2014).

Opinion

Cite as 2014 Ark. 58

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-13-332

CHRISTOPHER BRANNING Opinion Delivered February 6, 2014 APPELLANT PRO SE MOTION FOR RULE ON V. CLERK [BOONE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, NO. 05CR-04-244]

STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE GORDON WEBB, APPELLEE JUDGE

WRIT OF CERTIORARI ISSUED.

PER CURIAM

On January 8, 2013, the trial court entered an order denying appellant Christopher

Branning’s amended petition for postconviction relief pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal

Procedure 37.1 (2005). Appellant timely lodged an appeal of that order in this court. Now

before us is appellant’s motion for rule on clerk in which he seeks an order directing the clerk

to file his brief-in-chief that was tendered one day past the due date.

The record before us intimates that a hearing was held on February 25, 2011, at which

time appellant filed a pro se amended petition for postconviction relief and the trial court

appointed defense counsel to represent him. Neither the February 25 amended petition nor a

transcript of the hearing is included in the record. A second pro se amended petition, filed on

July 6, 2011, and the Rule 37.1 hearing held on July 8, 2011, are both part of the record. While

the trial court indicated at the July 8, 2011 Rule 37.1 hearing that it was considering the July 6

amended petition, it acted solely on the February 25 amended petition in its written order

denying relief. Cite as 2014 Ark. 58

Our examination of the record reveals that it is deficient in that it does not include the

amended petition for postconviction relief, filed on February 25, 2011, acted on by the trial

court in its written order. Before we can rule on the motion requesting leave to file a belated

brief, we find that there is a need to supplement the record. Accordingly, a writ of certiorari is

issued, returnable in thirty days, to bring up a copy of the amended petition for postconviction

relief, filed on February 25, 2011.

Christopher Branning, pro se appellant.

No response.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Earls v. Arkansas Department of Human Services
2017 Ark. 171 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2017)
Ingle v. Arkansas Department of Human Services
2014 Ark. 471 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2014)
Whitt v. Arkansas Department of Human Services
2014 Ark. App. 449 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2014)
Branning v. State
2014 Ark. 256 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2014 Ark. 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/branning-v-state-ark-2014.