Branigan v. Safir
This text of 269 A.D.2d 165 (Branigan v. Safir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered on or about July [166]*16619, 1999, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondents’ determination terminating petitioner’s employment as a probationary police officer, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
For the reasons stated in Matter of Williams v Safir (265 AD2d 182), we reject petitioner’s argument that because of McKinney’s Unconsolidated Laws of NY § 891 (L 1940, ch 834), he could not be terminated without a hearing. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Rubin, Andrias, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
269 A.D.2d 165, 701 N.Y.S.2d 900, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1050, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/branigan-v-safir-nyappdiv-2000.