Branigan v. Safir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Branigan v. Safir

269 A.D.2d 165, 701 N.Y.S.2d 900, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1050

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 3, 2000·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered on or about July [166]*16619, 1999, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondents’ determination terminating petitioner’s employment as a probationary police officer, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

For the reasons stated in Matter of Williams v Safir (265 AD2d 182), we reject petitioner’s argument that because of McKinney’s Unconsolidated Laws of NY § 891 (L 1940, ch 834), he could not be terminated without a hearing. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Rubin, Andrias, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered on or about July [166]*16619, 1999, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondents’ determination terminating petitioner’s employment as a probationary police officer, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

For the reasons stated in Matter of Williams v Safir (265 AD2d 182), we reject petitioner’s argument that because of McKinney’s Unconsolidated Laws of NY § 891 (L 1940, ch 834), he could not be terminated without a hearing. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Rubin, Andrias, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Branigan v. Safir, 269 A.D.2d 165, 701 N.Y.S.2d 900, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1050 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

269 A.D.2d 165 (Branigan v. Safir) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related