Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Alloro v. Safir

Alloro v. Safir

270 A.D.2d 89, 704 N.Y.S.2d 817, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2839
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 14, 2000
StatusPublished

This text of 270 A.D.2d 89 (Alloro v. Safir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Alloro v. Safir, 270 A.D.2d 89, 704 N.Y.S.2d 817, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2839 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered September 16, 1999, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondents’ determination terminating petitioner’s employment as a probationary police officer, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

For the reasons stated in Matter of Williams v Safir (265 AD2d 182, lv denied 94 NY2d 758), we reject petitioner’s argument that because of McKinney’s Unconsolidated Laws of NY § 891 (L 1940, ch 834) he could not be terminated without a hearing (Matter of Branigan v Safir, 269 AD2d 165). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Safir
265 A.D.2d 182 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Branigan v. Safir
269 A.D.2d 165 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
270 A.D.2d 89, 704 N.Y.S.2d 817, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alloro-v-safir-nyappdiv-2000.