Alloro v. Safir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Alloro v. Safir

270 A.D.2d 89, 704 N.Y.S.2d 817, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2839

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 14, 2000·Published

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered September 16, 1999, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondents’ determination terminating petitioner’s employment as a probationary police officer, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

For the reasons stated in Matter of Williams v Safir (265 AD2d 182, lv denied 94 NY2d 758), we reject petitioner’s argument that because of McKinney’s Unconsolidated Laws of NY § 891 (L 1940, ch 834) he could not be terminated without a hearing (Matter of Branigan v Safir, 269 AD2d 165). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered September 16, 1999, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondents’ determination terminating petitioner’s employment as a probationary police officer, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

For the reasons stated in Matter of Williams v Safir (265 AD2d 182, lv denied 94 NY2d 758), we reject petitioner’s argument that because of McKinney’s Unconsolidated Laws of NY § 891 (L 1940, ch 834) he could not be terminated without a hearing (Matter of Branigan v Safir, 269 AD2d 165). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Mazzarelli, Ellerin, Lerner and Friedman, JJ.

Alloro v. Safir, 270 A.D.2d 89, 704 N.Y.S.2d 817, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2839 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

270 A.D.2d 89 (Alloro v. Safir) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related