Brandon v. Stanley
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7864
GEORGE BRANDON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HENRY W. STANLEY, JR., Chief of Police; JAY S. KEGLEY, Individual/Police Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:06-cv-00276-RAJ)
Submitted: March 7, 2007 Decided: April 3, 2007
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Brandon, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
George Brandon appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint
based on his failure to pay a partial filing fee. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Brandon v. Stanley,
No. 2:06-cv-00276-RAJ (E.D. Va. Oct. 11, 2006). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brandon v. Stanley (Brandon v. Stanley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.