Brandon v. Stanley

Fourth Circuit

Brandon v. Stanley

223 F. App'x 207

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 3, 2007·No. No. 06-7864·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

George Brandon appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint based on his failure to pay a partial filing fee. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brandon v. Stanley, No. 2:06-cv-00276-RAJ (E.D.Va. Oct. 11, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before [208]*208the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

George Brandon appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint based on his failure to pay a partial filing fee. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brandon v. Stanley, No. 2:06-cv-00276-RAJ (E.D.Va. Oct. 11, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before [208]*208the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Brandon v. Stanley, 223 F. App'x 207 (4th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

223 F. App'x 207 (Brandon v. Stanley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related