Brand v. City of Lawrenceville

55 S.E. 967, 127 Ga. 237, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 812
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 16, 1906·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

Neither under the provisions of-§ 5543 of the Civil Code, nor under any other provision of law in this State, is one who has been a trial judge given any authority to certify, after the judge goes out of' office by resignation or otherwise, a “fast” bill of exceptions. See, in this connection, Grace v. Gordon, 113 Ga. 88. It follows that where a petition for injunction was heard before a judge of the superior court,, who, after refusing the injunction, resigned his office, and, after his. • .resignation had gone into effect, certified to this court a bill of exceptions assigning error upon his ruling refusing the injunction, this court did not acquire jurisdiction, and the writ of error will he dismissed.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brand v. City of Lawrenceville, 55 S.E. 967, 127 Ga. 237, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 812 (Ga. 1906).

55 S.E. 967 (Brand v. City of Lawrenceville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Triola v. Triola
787 S.E.2d 206 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2016)
People v. Collado
33 P.R. 114 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1924)
Pueblo v. Collado
33 P.R. Dec. 118 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1924)
Wright v. State
63 S.E. 936 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Scott v. State
63 S.E. 936 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)